Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Evangelicals and Mennonites and Anglicans (oh my)!

Elliot and Diedre have both posted recently about Mennonites and Evangelicals, and it got me thinking.

I met Jeremiah on the bus recently. He had some things to say about the Church—about where it is going and where it has been.

Jeremiah is in his late fifties. He’s missing a few teeth, and his breath is unpleasant. His grammar is flawed and his logic is questionable. He’s in love with Jesus. As we rode the bus together, he told me earnestly about the Anglican church, and how it is failing in its mandate to witness to the world. He told me about a preacher he knew who believed in miracles and preached about life-changing faith. He told me about God's work in the church.

I've spent a lot of time in the past few years with people who would call themselves intellectuals. CMU was my church when I first came to Winnipeg, and it has constituted almost my entire experience with Mennonites. Through CMU, I gained a lot of respect for the Mennonite church. At CMU I found people who took their faith seriously, who thought deeply about the challenges of Christian faith, and about how we should live in light of that faith. I found people who argued passionately a Christian ecological stewardship of this earth. I found people who for intelligent and complex reasons were convinced that God calls us to make peace in every way, and that as Christians pacifism is a necessity.

I also found people for whom "Was Hitler redeemable?" and "Is an American soldier redeemable?" are questions of equivalent difficulty, and the strong instinctive answer to both is "no". I found people who look down their noses at "stupid fundamentalists", who exhibit a hostility which is difficult to call by any name other than hatred for people who take the Bible literally. I was introduced to a two churches (MB and MC Canada) with so much hostility for each other that I was surprised that they had any left for the rest of the world. But they did. I found people who, in between statements on pacifism and reconciliation breathed venom for the Billy Graham and divided their own churches. I found people who would have utter disdain for Jeremiah and his kind of Christianity.

My church now is St. Margaret's Anglican. It contitutes most of my experience with the Anglican church. In the Anglican church I found people with a love of the sacramental mysteries, who feel that there is more in heaven and on earth than is dreamt of on our philosophy. I found people with a deep respect for the symbolism of the church. I found a church that produces art and literature. I found a litergy with generations worth of insight and wisdom written into it, and a church structure that is carefully and intelligently designed to be meaningful on more levels than we may be aware of. At St. Margaret's I found preaching of a kind I'd never experienced before, intellectually challenging and engaging. David quotes the Bible and Barth and Luther and Augustine and Plato and Bonhoffer, and other people I would never have heard of at the AGC church I grew up in. People whose names I probably still wouldn't recognize if I hadn't been to CMU for four years. At St. Margaret's I found people who engage their faith on an intellectual level, and who truely try to love the Lord their God with all thier mind.

And I've found a church that teaches (implicitly, mind you) that education improves a person's worth. I've found a church where intellectual posturing and condescention are par for the course. I've found people who genuinely believe that if you haven't read Barth's dogmatics then you are failing in your mandate as a Christian. I've found people who are sure that our salvation lies in our ability to think through theological problems. I've found people with utter disdain for fundamentalist evangelical Christianity. St. Margaret's allows itself to be evangelical in theory by thinking of themselves as smart evangelicals, and behind our smiles we laugh at the stupid people who think that the world was created in seven days.

But Christ does not teach smug satisfaction. Christ teaches love. Jesus was much harder on the intellectual elite than he was on the uneducated. And demononational rivalry is the great shame of the Christian church. We are one body. Evangelicals and Fundamentalists also serve in the body of Christ.

Theology is important. An intellectual engagement with God and with his Christ is important. Pacifism and social conciousness is important. But all this is not the Gospel, and no one will be saved by their theology, or by their works. Salvation comes from God, not from us.

Both Mennonites and Anglicans have failed and continue to fail. As do Fundamentalists and Baptists and Presyterians and Pentacostals. This doensn't make them hypocrates, though. It is possible to believe in something and still fail to live up to it. It's called "sin", and it's what we should expect.

And salvation comes from God. It comes for Mennonites and for Anglicans. It came for Jeremiah, and it comes for me.

Halleluia

6 comments:

Elliot said...

Very true!!

The good thing about St. Margaret's is that none of the leadership think you need to read Barth to attain salvation. I seem to remember David (or someone) saying "Christ did not come so we could have theory and have it more abundantly." It's just the smarmy theology-geek students who show up. You guys seem to have had run-ins with them - I've somehow avoided them.

It seems to me that by not loving God with all their minds, fundamentalists end up doing ridiculously un-Christian things ; while intellectuals think that loving God with their whole mind permits them to not love Him with their whole hearts, which leads THEM to do ridiculously un-Christian things.

See, I wasn't even aware of the MB and MC hatred... Shows how much I know.

I think it was John Donne who encountered early Mennonites back in the 1600s and commented on their incredibly bitter factionalism, even (or especially) with families.

Diedre said...

You mean you guys HAVEN'T read Barth's Church Dogmatics? I mean, it's only about 12 volumes long! (And by all reports, it's pretty tough slogging too.)

Paul, please do correct me if I'm wrong here, but I'm chalking up your interpretation of the hatred between MB's and MC's as a bit of Pauline hyperbole. My impression of it all is a sort of sibling rivalry where we love to pick on each other and get each other's goat (and God forbid anybody deems this as perfectly acceptable), but we really do love each other deep down somewhere even if we don't understand each other completely.

I grew up in an MC congregation with a significant number of ex-MB's. I think their love-frustration relationships ("love-hate" would be inaccurate) with their old churches led me to see it this way. They all seemed to love their MB roots with a slight sigh or grain of salt on the side. Perhaps that's how the MB's feel about us.

Let me also point out that Mennonites ARE Evangelical, as in, we believe in the power of the gospel/good news and the need to spread it. Some of us have more difficulty with this than others, or at least vastly differing opinions as to how to go about evangelising. I've tried to avoid labeling "them" simply as evangelicals, because that's "us" too.

In conclusion, my response to your post is AMEN. This is what theology in action is all about. Let's do it! Let's talk, let's study, let's pray, let's live, let's serve, let's observe, let's blog, let's worship, let's read! All for the glory of God.

Jan said...

I don't think it's entirely "Pauline Hyperbole" (a term which I'm totally using from now on, by the way) to say that MBs and MCs hate each other. I never felt so rejected as I did when I told (certain)people at CMU that I was from an MB church. It actually made me ashamed to say it.

Elliot said...

Pauline Hyperbole! Ahahaha!

We totally need to make that a household phrase.

Sue said...

Amen, Paul, Amen.
I listened to a sermon once on the "kergyma" that enlightened some of my thinking about denominationalism. It was at *gasp* the Billy Graham School of Evangelism (where I was dreadfully scared that we'd be going door-to-door handing out tracts, but the lure of staying at the Chateau Lake Louise kept me from saying no), where I was pleasantly surprised to hear some excellent teaching on this kind of stuff.

The very basic premise of his message was that there are 3 "circles" within every church that affect its congregation. The kergyma (or essentials) of Christianity is in the centre of all Christian churches. These are things like Christ's life & ministry, his death and ressurection, forgiveness and salvation, and his body: the church.

But we have surrounded these essentials with another circle called convictions. These are things that are largely determined by culture and slightly determined by emotions. Things like drinking, women in ministry, etc. Where both sides can find biblical support for their oppinion.

And we have surrounded these convictions with another circle called preferences. These are slightly based on culture and largely based on emotion. Stuff like worship and teaching styles would fall into this category.

Unfortunately, the church often divides over preferences the most, and convictions next. When we really should be most concerned about the essentials. Like you said, we all have sin and there will never be a perfect church or denomination. The thing to do is find and appreciate the way each church celebrates the essentials. If we are constantly doing that, we will have a lot more love, and a lot less hatred, for our fellow Christians.

Sue :)

Paul said...

Thanks for all the comments!

Elliot, I agree it's good that David doesn't think that intellect will lead to salvation. I'm not so sure about some of the other people at St. Margaret's. Fortunately, I'm not the one who has to be sure.

Diedre, I've witnessed some animosity that goes beyond sibling rivalry. I've witnessed a lot of grace and love also, but I have seen contempt and resentment that doesn't have much deep-down love underneath it. But I do freely admit to "Pauline hyperbole". That's why it's "The World According to Paul", not "The World". :)

Sue, it's sad how often people seem to confuse those circles of church life. I think it's great that denomonations exist so that people can be in a church with their favourite worship style, but it sucks that these denomonations of Christians have tended to be hostile to each other instead of loving.