Geez magazine has a parody of Make Poverty History—Make Affluence History. I will admit out front that I have a few issues with Geez magazine, with their approach, their philosophy and their mission. This parody exemplifies some of what I think is wrong with Geez and their ilk.
Make affluence history is a clever parody of make poverty history. It raises some important points succesfully shifts my perspective and shatters some assumptions. It is indeed true that the children of wealth need prayer by virtue of their wealth. There is an intention here that I admire. However, the practical result is to allow self-satisfied people to smugly stop supporting the poor in favour of mocking the rich. A parody like this belittles the efforts of people who are doing the work of God--supporting the needy. A parody like this encourages people to stop supporting the poor. It makes the rich—and let's face it, the people writing this parody, the people producing Geez magazine, for all their talk about simplicity are rich in comparison to most of the world simply by virtue of living in Canada and the people viewing the parody are rich in that they have access to the internet; those who practice voluntary simplicity are still rich in that their simplicity is voluntary—feel better about themselves and do less to help the poor.
Saturday, August 19, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
well said, paul.
Their ilk, eh?
[images a bunch of smug post-modernists with antlers, roaming across the subarctic wilderness]
Ilk. Not elk. Ilk.
Well said Paul, but I don't completely agree. At least you recognize that the "practical effects" of the parody you outline are not the intended effects. However, I don't think this parody belittles, I think it challenges. If, as you say, self satisfied people stop supporting the poor to mock the rich, this says more about those self satisfying people than it does about Gees magazine and their ilk. The goal of Gees and this particular parody are to shake up those who are self satisfied and those who think they do enough by wearing a bracelet or admiring Bono.
Post a Comment